Restrictions:External description: PLEASE NOTE: Can resell subject ONLY to thefollowing conditions: 1. Clients and customers to whom the materialis sold or onpassed are NOT ALLOWED to: a) use extracts of Inquiryproceedings in any light entertainment programme or in a programmeof political satire; b) use extracts from Inquiry proceedings inparty political broadcasts; c) use extracts of Inquiry proceedingsin any form of advertising, promotion or other form of publicity,except in the form of trailers for programmes provided that the useof such extracts in the form of trailers for programmes shallcomply with the requirements of these regulations. 2. Subject toparagraph 1 above, extracts of Inquiry proceedings may be includedin broadcast "magazine" programmes which also contain music orhumorous features, provided that the different types of item arekept separate. Also, to the extent that we are approached by anybroadcaster wanting access to these materials whose officeheadquarters or principal place of business is located in Iraq weare obliged to supply these at a much reduced rate which must be nomore than 25% of the rate at which ITN sells equivalent materialsto any broadcaster whose office headquarters or principal place ofbusiness is located outside Iraq.Francis Aldhouse giving evidence SOT- "Certainly about being very careful. I -- yes, this is arather short statement and rather compressed. I don't wish -- Idon't wish to speak up for or be seen to be speaking up for thepractices that have already been exposed to the Inquiry, but Isuppose I am concerned that if one talks about the press andjournalism generally, that you shouldn't catch up the innocentalong with the guilty. I have a particular concern because ofmeetings I've attended and things that have been said to me aboutconsequences for local newspapers. I mean, if I have an anxiety,and the effect -- the problem of a chilling effect, it's for theGloucester Citizen, the Oxford Mail, the Farnham Herald and theNutsford Guardian, not the Sun and the Daily Mail."Lord Justice Leveson SOT- "But that wouldn't be to permit them to breach Section 55,would it?"Francis Aldhouse giving evidence SOT- "Um ..."Lord Justice Leveson SOT- "What you're concerned about is the viability of localnewspapers providing a local service for the local communities, Iassume?"Francis Aldhouse giving evidence SOT- "Yes. But local newspapers have been concerned about theway that, for example, defamation has been used to put them in somefinancial difficulty, and I wouldn't want -- I wouldn't want a dataprotection legislation to simply be another rod to beat their backswith."Lord Justice Leveson SOT- "I'm sorry, Mr Jay. Has any local newspaper ever suggestedto you that they were concerned that Section 55 of the DataProtection Act was going to cause them difficulty?"Francis Aldhouse giving evidence SOT- "Not in so -- no, because the time -- my discussionspredate that. I'm thinking back to my discussions in 1996 on howone might implement article 9 of the directive, and certainlyconcerns were expressed to me then about -- I have a particularmeeting in mind and certainly concerns were expressed about thefragility of local newspapers and the legal threats they felt theywere under."Robert Jay QC questioning Francis Aldhouse SOT- "Operation Motorman wasn't involved or concerned with localnewspapers, was it?"Francis Aldhouse giving evidence SOT- "No, absolutely not."